Saturday, October 17, 2026

Dusty Books

     A couple years ago, I started the process of moving my home office from the smallest room of my house to the middle sized room that also houses my internet equipment, and I started by moving my bookshelves. You can see back there where the first bookshelf has already been moved from

    Because anyone who has ever moved a bookshelf will tell you don’t do it with the books on it, I first emptied it, having to handle each book individually and move it to a liminal holding space, (also called the floor of the new office). As I was moving the books, I found myself glancing over titles, and have small thoughts about each book. Like any self aware book owner, I own far more books than I have read. Any book owner who has read all the books they own has a poor curiosity, lives in a box, or reads beyond all other mortal interests.

    There are books I bought and have yet to read, books I received, and never intended to read (All these Tom Clancy, John Grisham, and Michael Crichton books, my ‘Dad book library’ if you will), and then I started finding books I had utterly forgotten about. ‘A Memoir of an Unwanted Chinese Daughter’ Salman Rushdie’s ‘The Satanic Verses’, and a hundred other books that are irresistible to me, but somehow I never read them, and then completely forgot them. And I should admit I felt guilty for forgetting them. 

    But beyond guilt, I was put into mind of Marie Kondo, who famously said in her Netflix series, to hold each of your possessions, and if it doesn’t ‘Spark Joy’ get rid of it. I’m deeply aware of the storm of feuding opinions that this was generating when it aired, and I’m sorry for Marie, who made the very easy mistake of saying something generalized on the internet that took on a life of its own. As far as I have ever been aware, Marie is a lovely person who likes home organization, and shouldn't have been at the center of a an internet firestorm.


    But I digress. Where was I?


    Handling my books. I don’t know if it was a problem of translation, or just a problem of generalized intention, but what I felt wasn't exactly Joy but about being reminded of ‘Value’ and relatedly ‘Values’. I would hold a book briefly, like the Tao of Jeet Kune Do, by Bruce Lee, and be reminded of the ways in which that book had changed me(Since I’ve had and reread it dozens of times since high school), or hold Robert M Pirsig’s “Lila: an inquiry into morals” Which i have owned for about a decade now, but haven’t read because I’m still working on Zen and the Art of Motorcycle maintenance(Coincidentally, a study of Values).

    As humans we contain multitudes, but by limited perception, we don’t know where our shoes are. There is value in exploring your own space, in going into places, even just in your own home, and taking the time to rediscover the things there, the memories they attach to, and the opportunities that are offered to pick up a thought you put down and follow it.


    I’m Ursa, I like you, and I’ll see you again soon.  


Saturday, October 10, 2026

By New Year

By New Year

By New Light


By flickering candle


By streetlit bright


From barside seat


In midnight cheer


Feeling far


From friends so dear


A night maligned


For failing hopes


For failing attempts


Of all years wrote


Raise up your flute


And shout once more


‘I'll try again’ 


Evermore


One more time with feeling

     Its been a long time, and I have been neglecting this page. Sorry about that. 

    But I have been writing in the interim. So posts for the next while will be from a backlog. Some of them represent a state of mind that has passed, some are waking dreams or ramblings. But whatever I post, I've decided has some value to be seen, even if it feels tremendously vulnerable to put unfinished work into the world. But I've also never met or heard from an artist who thought any work was completely 'Done', only pushed out the door beyond their control.

    John Green said about art(specifically about books, but also art in general) "Both the reader and the author must bring their deepest self to it." and I think that if both you and I approach my work wanting to feel deeply from it, then it will work, even if it is unpolished and frayed and shows parts of me to the world that make me want to hide it away. So for bringing yourself to my work as I try, I deeply thank and appreciate you.

I'm also going to try to stick to a posting schedule for once. So lookout for new content on Saturdays, mostly because that's the day I can wrench my brain towards creating in a way that feels important.

As always, I like you, and wish you well.

-Ursa 


P.S. I go by Ursa now.

Friday, November 14, 2025

Movie Review: Tron Ares

 The Good: 

  • Visually Stunning. The art department was absolutely on point and they earned every penny of their pay and more.

  • Remarkably, Jared Leto’s acting is not generally at fault, though I’m not sure his overly talky moments were *intended* for him to sound like an overly verbose LLM, but they definitely did.

  • Jeff Bridges is in it. Unfortunately his role in it is both small and raises questions and inconsistencies.

The Bad:

  • Characterizations are remarkably shallow, and the attempts to deepen them feel shallower. Ares transition from cold calculating program to empathetic hero is like a light switch, and the visual shorthand of him absorbing Eve’s human moments is over in way less time than it should, considering the movie is stacking the job of *his* lightspeed emotional growth on top of the job of informing *us* about Eve’s emotional stakes. Jaret Leto’s ham handed armchair therapizing her about it is about as ham handed as it gets. I’d really rather have my exposition in a text crawl before I get it like the movie delivers it. Eve herself gives up any meaningful agency as soon as Ares is on screen. Its the Jared Leto show and it knows it.

  • I cannot recall where the idea originated, but there is a worldbuilding idea that says that the unreal parts of your world need to be able to withstand three levels of scrutiny, IE, I should be able to ask three questions, each digging deeper into a particular aspect of your lore. EX: How does a star trek warp drive work?

Layer 1:  It creates a warp bubble around the ship which stretches the space in front of and compresses the space behind the ship, causing superluminal speed. 

Layer 2: The warp field is generated when power from a matter antimatter reaction is funneled into the warp core

Layer 3: Dilithium crystals regulate the matter/antimatter reaction to allow stable energy transfer to the warp core

Star Trek is well built enough that you can go deeper, but the idea is that if you explain something three levels deep, it allows suspension of disbelief to be maintained because your imagination wont bother to reach further to know something is wrong.

Depending on what part of Tron Ares we are looking it, it fails at getting two levels deep, and often it fails at level one. 

I’ll give a little leeway for how the particle laser works, because anyone who knows even the basics of matter energy conversion requirements has been screaming since the end of Tron Legacy, though if there is even *feasibility* about materializing a full human woman, then it breaks hard when we talk about, say, materializing a *skyscraper sized flying machine*

And that brings me to where this movie just looks at consistency in storytelling or. *physics* and says “Na brah. We don’t do that here”.

Tron and Tron:Legacy do a good part of their storytelling lifting by establishing that the events of the narrative happen inside the computer, where what we see is a metaphor of computer system operations made ‘physical’ but only really in the visual sense. The physical operations of ‘The Grid’  are representations of computer functions, so there are fantastical things that happen without triggering any disbelief in the viewer. We’re on the grid, go fuckin nuts. And while Tron Legacy *Hinted* at the possibility of Grid machines coming to the real world, it stopped short, with just a ‘We made a human” And was smart enough to leave that pandoras box of logical shitshows alone. 

Tron Ares presents all those logical nightmares and more by having all the Grid Tech, when manifested, operate *exactly* as it does in the grid, but in the real world. Where we have Aerodynamics, and Newtonian Physics, and Special relativity, and Ares DOES NOT GIVE ONE FUCK about any of it. Skyscraper sized floating parentheses, vehicles of all shapers and sizes that produce physically tangible (and destructive) ribbons of light with no regard for energy to matter conversion requirements. I desperately wanted to scream at the screen, but there were two whole other people in the theater and I did respect their experience more than I did this disregard for sane depictions of physics. 

Ok, I’m taking a breath. Lets do something lighter

  • Trent Reznor’s score is ok, but he’s eclipsed by the audio masterpiece that was Daft Punk in Tron: Legacy. I think there's a possible version of this movie where the more raw synthetics add a delicious instability to the proceedings, but even then, it was never going to match Daft Punk perfection.

  • I think that overall, what the film does in essentially every aspect, is create more questions than it answers, while also making near zero effort to meaningfully connect itself to either of the previous movies. Sam Flynn and Quorra, are not addressed beyond lazy write outs. Kevin Flynn appears in the movie, and the movie actively avoids addressing what happened to him at the conclusion of Tron:Legacy. The visual style is, again, absolutely top tier, but the visual language is not supported by narrative consistency with itself or previous entries in the series.

2 stars


Friday, January 20, 2023

DnD OGL 1.2 survey responses.

Hi all,


Not really a normal blog post, but it's a good place to put my DnD OGL 1.2 survey response.

If you feel like going back through my other blog posts, I'm that'd make me feel dandy, but it's not required.

If any of my survey feels like something you want to use, feel free to put it in your survey response. 

OPENDND!


There are numerous concerns with 1.2, and while it is a step in the right direction, here are issues that need to be corrected:


OGL 1.0a deauthorization: this clause needs better wording to protect the existing IPs and to protect new creations that use OGL1.0a content without requiring the original content be re-released under the OGL1.2. A grace period of not less than 6 months from the switch from 1.0a to 1.2 should be included to allow any in process works to be completed under the 1.0a license as long as the production process began before the introduction of 1.2


The included content licensed under Creative Commons should include not only mechanics, but images, class, race/species, and creatures, up to and including all content from the Players Handbook, Dungeon Masters Guide, and Monster Manual.


As written, the terms 'Perpetual' and Irrevokabke are unsatisfactory. Perpetual needs to be updated to prevent future changes. "Has no set end date" just indicates that you can end it whenever you like, which is unacceptable. Perpetual must mean that you cannot revoke it, or must give substantial notice to change or remove.  Additionally, your definition of Irrevocable only applies to content published while the OGL 1.2 is in effect. Irrevocable must indicate that the OGL *cannot* be revoked, even for new content created after you have made an OGL 1.3, 1.4 etc.


Section 3a and 3b:

Allow lawsuits for Wizards infringement on 3rd party IP to result in injunctive damages in addition to monetary ones. If you infringe on someone's IP, but can still make and distribute the infringing content, then all that becomes, to you, is an inconvenient fine and the destruction of a livelihood, as you are able to market your copied content better than the original works. 


Section 6e and 6f:


These clauses are too vague and give Wizards too much discretion to pull creator licenses without oversight or reasonable recourse. 'Will not violate the law in any way relating to this license" is an easily manipulated phrasing that sets up creators to be bullied by Wizards or any leadership based on personal preference and whims. Additionally, as laws can vary from State to State and Country to country. These inconsistent legal frameworks also open a Grey area for creators under protected legal classes to be harassed, bullied, and have their livelihoods impacted because of laws that are unjust or misused.

The same is generally true of "Hateful conduct".

What if a creator writes content aimed at making awareness about racial issues, or writes an adventure in which the struggles against racist or hateful acts is part of the content? Would the the portrayal of the acts being fought constitute content that could result in a license revocation?

You should not be in the position to wield that much power against creators livelihoods.



9d

Wizards should not retain the right to cancel the entire license because a portion is unenforceable. We cannot trust that Wizards will not bake in a fully illegal section, and use that to premise invalidating the entire license. If a section of OGL is found to be illegal or unenforceable, only that section will be subject to amendment to ensure it is legal and enforceable.




VTTs should be free to implement features as they see fit. If they can include mechanics in VTT play, then you have no business limiting how they express those as visual or programmatic elements. This is a blatant attempt to limit 3rd party VTTs from creating features that you yourself would actively want to implement. VTTs absolutely shouldn't be allowed to rip off your art or the code for your visual features, but you cannot own the idea of virtual features. 

 that to premise invalidating the entire license. If a section of OGL is found to be illegal or unenforceable, only that section will be subject to amendment to ensure it is legal and enforceable.


9g.

No. We will retain the right to a jury trial if that is deemed necessary to the enforcement of this license. 




 

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Dad

 Its been almost 4 years since my dad passed away. And I've never had any shortage of complex thoughts about my relationship with him over the years. But I thought it might be cathartic to put down some words about him that aren't a eulogy, which is the last time I wrote about him in 2017.


It's weird to talk about how I felt about my dad growing up  because A. It was so long ago that the memories barely have cohesion and B. My interpretation of the events I remember has been changed much by both the information I have gained since my childhood, and the experiences in my life that change the way I understand my childhood experiences.

In many ways, it feels like I had two dads, Those two dads are differentiated by my perception of him as a child versus as an adult, but also by the stark changes that happened to him in the transition from my childhood to my adulthood.

I recall some vague stories about my father striking my other siblings in punishment but nothing clearly seen. I don't recall my father ever hitting me, but in many ways, he never needed to. If anyone could be described as the 'runt' of the family, it as me. In both physicality and in temperament, I was very small as a child. I was also very afraid a lot of the time for a lot of reasons. And of certain people. But no one more than Dad. He didn't need to hit me because his tone was often enough to make me hide from his presence and sniffle. I often wonder if wetting the bed until I was 9 was an awful circle in which the threat of hearing "God Dammit Billy" was somehow the catalyst for the terror that resulted in the peeing the bed in the first place.  At the same time, he was a loving father, who did a lot to bring joy to his children. But that was the rub. When we were happy, he was a good father, but when we were sad or unruly, he often became Bad dad.

For a long time I devoted significant time to trying to reconcile how someone could be both Good dad and Bad dad. It wasnt until I was in my mid 20's until I had a real understanding of what was going on. I didn't have a Good dad or a Bad dad. I had an Incomplete dad.

Toxic masculinity is a term that comes up a lot recently, and understanding what it is and how it is passed along was a big step in understanding and reconciling my father's behavior during my childhood

I never met my paternal grandfather. And for that I am incredibly grateful, because I think my life and the lives of everyone in my family would have been worse, had he lived to be an influence on us. I often try to think of my dad's parental shortcomings as incidental, and produced by what came before. And what came before was William Thrasher. Where my dad had unintentional bias, Thrasher was racist. Where my dad was trying to give discipline, Thrasher was violently abusive. He was an abusive, alcoholic racist and I can't even imagine what produced that. And in the abuses and behavior he displayed towards my father and his siblings, he passed on a crippling inability to process emotion in a healthy way, replacing it with abusive coping mechanisms. When I think of my father yelling at me for pissing the bed or getting angry that I started crying, I don't feel the shame anymore, or anger at him. I feel so deeply sad for him.

Because his father never told him it was ok to cry, or held him so he could. His father never made him feel safe or protected him, or gave him the things that a child needs from their fathers, to grow into a healthy person. I am eternally grateful that there were other influences that shaped my Dad. My grandfathers periodic absence in his life may have inadvertently curbed the damage. I feel sad for my father, but also a little proud because he was so much better than what came before him. 

That's the Dad I had as a child. A man who was never given the tools to interface with children in a healthy way.

I am very glad to say that those shortcomings were largely overcome as I grew and my dad aged, but it came at a cost, one that eventually took his life.

I don't know exactly when the Crohns diagnosis came, but it was around 1995 or 96 that I remember seeing some of the consequences. Dad was more often in pain, and had his first intestinal surgery. I remember him showing me the stomach staples. My mother also became permanently ill around time, developing a rare brain disorder that inhibited her larynx and surrounding muscles, causing breathing to be very difficult. She was permanently bedridden for several years until medication and therapy helped her regain ability. A lot of things happened in a very short time, but ultimately, my dad had an affair, due in part to my mother being bedridden, my parents divorced, and a cataclysmic split happened in the family. Looking back now, it doesn't seem that surprising. Even someone who wasn't emotionally unprepared would have had trouble with that. 

I wont chronicle in too much detail what happened after that, suffice to say that my father married his affair, and that failed, and he ended up in a position of being weekend Dad, and trying to cope with being the cause of an irreparably shattered family.

I can't say with certainty when it happened, but around 1999 or 2000 he started to become the Dad I knew as an adult. He was developing the tools of emotional well-being on his own, and to this day I am in awe that he was able to do it. 

Unfortunately, what I wasnt aware of was that his health was still turning downhill. His approach towards his Crohns was to mitigate the pain as much as he could, but he never took any serious action to curb its progression. He still smoked, and periodically drank, which exacerbated the condition.

But for a little while it was good. I often define one of the most stable periods of my childhood as the year my sister and I spent living with him. I had stopped wetting the bed, and he no longer appeared to me as a symbol of fear. When I didn't do well in school or was sad, he was stern, but understanding.  And that was the progression he continued on for many years. The biggest hit for him was a custody shift that took my sister and I away and sent us to live with our mother, which I still regret agreeing to. Because I never understood then just how much it hurt him. But he did grow from it and entered into his 3rd and only successful marriage, which he would stay in until his death.

As a teenager and adult I was able to continue having a positive relationship with him. When I visited, we would often talk about what had happened in years past. He admitted to, and, for me, earned forgiveness, for what had happened.

As an adult I made a trip down to see him and my stepmother regularly. His health, both physically and mentally was deteriorating. The Crohns had claimed several feet of is bowels and the best that he could manage was to reduce the pain just a little. He was perpetually in a state of regret for everything that had come before. His life lessons were some of the hardest earned I had ever seen, and in many ways that price was too high. 

In 2017, a lifetime of regrets, a body racked by intense, constant pain, and, what me and some of my siblings suspect was an unsafe transition of depression medication, caused his death by suicide at 60.

I've spent so many years compiling these thoughts in my head and seeing them through the lenses of the various people I've been.

I love who my Dad was, with all his flaws and mistakes, and he is a reminder that it's never too late to learn how to be better.

If you are a Father or in any similar position, please learn the lessons that he had to suffer for, and maybe we can have a world that doesn't make people suffer like he did

When your children are sad, give them comfort. When they are angry, give them patience and understanding. I cannot overstate how important it is to have a father who is a safe harbor, a calm and often smiling beacon that helps you cope with an overwhelming world so that you can feel safe going out into it.

These aren't just the ways we can help our children; these are emotional tools we are giving them that will spread and be passed down exponentially. And that's what Dad would've wanted. A better world for his children.


Tuesday, November 26, 2019

A beautiful day in the neighborhood review(Spoiler Free)

I went into this movie with some assumptions. Some of them were fulfilled and some were outdone entirely. A few of you have been subjected to the fondness that I possess for the documentary "Won't You Be My Neighbor". My assumption about this movie would that it would be a sentimental story about Fred Rogers and the life of a journalist he touched, but ultimately, the real Fred Rogers in the Documentary would maintain a stronger presence because it is made of real moments with him.

But this movie broke that assumption and became something entirely different. Not worse or better, but a different part of that legacy. The documentary treated us like we were meeting him. We got to know about him and see the man behind the sweater. This was different. We got to see how he affected others, and the profundity with which he did that by caring deeply about and valuing each interaction with every single person he met.

It would surprise you to know that Mr Rogers, as portrayed by Tom Hanks probably takes up less than half the screen time of the film. He isn't it's focus, but he is it's catalyst. And no moment with him is wasted either, not even a whole minute of silence.

For a long time my favorite movie was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind because if the artful direction, and the introspective way it approached our feelings. This new film has in a moment taken that peak. I am not a superstitious man and I have no belief in fate, but I have never seen a film that so perfectly captured me emotionally. It collected all of the odd and strange things that make me cry at movies and shows, and there are many people who will tell you that those moments aren't usual for me, and it put them all in perfect arrangement right there with scenes that might have been pulled right out of my own life.

But ultimately, the biggest reason it will now take the place in my heart right at the top, is because it didn't just tell a story about Mister Rogers, it did exactly what he was always trying to do, and showed people who might not know, that their feelings, no matter how big or insurmountable they seem, are mentionable and manageable, and that doing so will always make things a little better. And as a bonus, we get one more episode of Mister Rogers Neighborhood to encapsulate the story.
----
This was initially a story I posted on my facebook, but I decided to move it to to this blog and revive it for a time because there were more thoughts I had.

I've been looking up reviews of the movie, not to see the accollades, but to see the negative reviews, however scarce they are. But as with all things, not everyone can like everything. As I was readng the negative reviews, I started to mentally codify the points that many of them were making, and find any common complaint. What I found was in line with other movies that have been almost universally applauded: Expectations.

The most common complaint I could find about the film was that "The movie isnt really about Mister Rogers, he's barely in it" or some variation about not getting as much of Mister Rogers as they believed had been advertised. The strange thing about reading these reviews is that I didn't disagree with the premise of the argument, but I interpreted it differently. As I stated earlier, the 2018 documentary was a profile on Fred Rogers as a man and the movie was about his legacy. It told us how he shaped and affected us as collective culture. But thats a pretty lofty idea to wrap your head around, so its to be expected. I also expected the movie to be more about Mister Rogers, but in not doing so, it did something so much richer that I am genuinely sad to say was lost a few viewers who decried it as "Boring" or "Underwhelming".

I actually laughed at my desk when one reviewer wrote that "long parts of the movie were boring and uninteresting" because anyone who has a passing knowledge of Fred Rogers body of work or who he was as a media creator understand that slow and boring is the point. He was a master of weaponizing silence and long periods of non-event time to illuminate his ideas. It would be like saying the Mona Lisa was uninteresting because she's not smiling more, or  saing Starry Night couldve used fireworks in the background.

And maybe the saddest part is that those are exactly the people that Fred wanted to connect to. People who cant stand silence or slowness, and need to be distracted. I hope that at least some of the people who had those complaints would watch it again and just listen to the silence and see what it can tell them about themselves.

-Will